QUESTIONING TECHNIQUES AND HIGH ORDER THINGKING IN STUDENTS LEARNING GROUP

Ria Dhatun Nikmah

Abstract


Questioning is an essential strategy for effective communication. This study examined questioning techniques used by students and the Critical thinking processes involved in questioning. There was also an attempt to find out the differences between the patterns of using questions between the two groups. Data were sourced from student learning group through audio and video taping the sessions and were analyzed using types of questioning. Findings indicated that students asked higher order in level questions such as open - ended, interpretive, and evaluative, inquiry, inferential, and synthesis, while most students raised lower cognitive questions including facts, closed, direct, recall, and knowledge type questions. It is suggested that using higher level questioning technique, more frequently used by teacher as more competent speakers in comparison to students, can foster learning and students are required to attend higher levels of questioning techniques to enhance their speculative, inferential and evaluative thinking ability


Keywords


questioning techniques, high order thinking, learning group

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by A Committee of College and University Examiners. New York: Longman.

Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in Classrooms: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Review of Educational Research. 61(2): 157.

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate produc¬tive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.

Cunningham, R. T. (1987). What kind of question is that? In W. W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 67-94). Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

Dumteeb, N. (2009). Teachers’ Questioning Techniques and Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: English Language Classroom in the Thai Context. Oklahoma: Oklahoma University.

Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behavior and student learning: What research says to teachers. Retrieved from ERIC database.

Hannel, I. (2009). Insufficient questioning. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 65-69

Harrop, A., & Swinson, J. (2003). Teachers’ questions in the infant, junior and secondary school. Educational Studies, 29(1), 49-57.

Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, Contexts and World Englishes: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Moore, L., & Rudd, R. (2002). Using Socratic questioning in the classroom. Agricultural Edu¬cation Magazine, 75(3), 24-25.

Overholser, J. C. (1992). Socrates in the classroom. The Social Studies, 83(2), 77-82.

Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Books.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2002) (thied edition ed.). Pearsone Education Limited.

Riegle, R. P. (1976). Classifying classroom questions. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 156-161.

Ross, W. (1860). Methods of instruction. Barnard’s American Journal of Education, 9, 367-379.

Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds? New York: Harper & Row.

Wilen, W. W. (1987). Why Questions? Questions, Questioning Techniques, and Effective Teaching. NEA Professional Library.

Wilson, N. S., & Smetana, L. (2009). Questioning as Thinking: A Metacognitive Framework. Middle School Journal. 41(2): 9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/aicll.v1i1.18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Annual International Conference on Language and Literature (AICLL)

Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Website : http://aicll.sastra.uisu.ac.id/index.php/aicll/index
Email : aicll2018@sastra.uisu.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Annual International Conference on Language and Literature (AICLL) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License